You Fitch! The case against Abercrombie

 

Gillian Orr
Sunday 19 May 2013 19:45 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Abercrombie and Fitch, the US clothing retailer known for its preppy casualwear and toned sales staff, has always prided itself on being an exclusive brand, but it is currently alienating so many people, it will soon be a small wonder if it has any customers left.

The last month alone has seen the company accused of being sizeist, elitist and ableist. And, while most of the incidents are taking place across the pond, the backlash is spreading across the internet, meaning it may be only a matter of time before it affects business in UK branches.

First came comments from Robin Lewis, co-author of The New Rules of Retail, who told Business Insider that Abercrombie’s CEO, Mike Jeffries, “doesn’t want larger people shopping in his store, he wants thin and beautiful people”. Indeed, while the chain provides men’s clothes in XL and XXL (to appeal to beefed-up young sportsmen), they fail to make or sell womenswear in any size above large.

The interview dragged up outlandish quotes that Jeffries gave in a 2006 piece in Slate, including: “A lot of people don’t belong [in our clothes], and they can’t belong. Are we exclusionary? Absolutely.” The resurfacing of such comments inspired demonstrations outside an Abercrombie store in Chicago, while 18-year-old Benjamin O’Keefe created an online petition calling for a boycott of the store. It currently has more than 20,000 signatures. Jeffries has since released a statement suggesting his comments were taken out of context.

Then, last week, writer Greg Karber launched a campaign urging people to donate Abercrombie clothes to the homeless, to counter the ideal sold by A&F. In a YouTube clip that has been viewed six million times in less than a week, Karber hands out Abercrombie apparel to homeless people on Los Angeles’ Skid Row. Which is also a bit offensive, if you think about it, but Karber’s heart is in the right place.

Meanwhile, a Denver-based federal judge ruled last week that the entrances to hundreds of Hollister stores (the teen-focused brand of Abercrombie) violate the Americans with Disabilities Act and, despite ordering Abercrombie to work with disability rights advocates, the two sides failed to come to an agreement.

Whether Abercrombie’s behaviour affects sales at the $4bn company remains to be seen. But you can bet its public relations department is currently working overtime.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in