Ariana Grande sues Forever 21 for using look-a-like model in adverts
Complaint accuses fashion brand of trademark infringement
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Ariana Grande is suing Forever 21 for $10m (£8m) after the fashion retailer allegedly used her name and likeness to promote its products.
In a complaint filed in Los Angeles federal court on Monday, Grande’s lawyers accused the clothing brand and beauty company Riley Rose – which is owned by the daughters of Forever 21’s founders – of trademark infringement.
The lawsuit was launched after both companies allegedly published at least 30 unauthorised images and videos that created a false perception Grande had endorsed the brands.
According to the complaint, the allegations follow the breakdown of talks with Forever 21 to create a collaborative social media campaign after the company refused to pay the proposed amount.
The document, which asserts that the market value for a single Instagram post by Grande is “well into the six figures,” says negotiations commenced in December 2018.
However, the deal never came to fruition because “the amounts that Forever 21 offered to pay for the right to use Ms Grande’s name and likeness were insufficient for an artist of her stature”.
Grande’s lawyers state that the Forever 21 and Riley Rose launched a “misleading campaign across its website and social media platforms” instead of paying for the right to the singer’s assets.
“Forever 21’s and Riley Rose’s unauthorised use of Ms Grande’s name, image, likeness and music to promote their brands and products are blatant and wilful violations of her statutory and common law rights of publicity,” the complaint reads.
“By this action, plaintiffs seek an award of actual damages, the disgorgement of Forever 21’s ill-gotten profits, and an award of punitive damages to deter Forever 21 and Riley Rose from future violations of Plaintiff’s personal and intellectual property rights”.
The complaint included a number of cases where Grande’s lawyers suggested Forever 21 had misappropriated the singer’s name, image and likeness.
Examples included Instagram posts that used a “look-alike model” who was dressed in clothes and accessories resembling those worn by Grande in her music videos, and the use of lyrics from Grande’s song "7 Rings" in the caption.
On Tuesday, the United States District Court Central District of California confirmed to The Independent that a judge has not yet been assigned to Grande’s case.
The Independent has contacted Forever 21 for comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments