'Distracted boyfriend meme' is sexist, rules Swedish advertising watchdog

It's been declared degrading to both men and women

Rachel Hosie
Wednesday 26 September 2018 17:22 BST
Comments
(Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It’s one of the most iconic memes of the past couple of years: the distracted boyfriend.

It’s been applied to all sorts of situations, from Love Island to Brexit.

Now, however, the ‘distracted boyfriend’ meme - in which a young man’s head is turned by a passing woman, leaving the woman whose hand he’s holding aghast - has been criticised for being sexist by an advertising watchdog.

According to Sweden’s Advertising Ombudsman, the use of the meme, by a company looking to recruit new employees, is “degrading” to both men and women.

Bahnhof, a Swedish internet service provider, posted the meme with the girlfriend labelled as ‘your current workplace,’ the distracted boyfriend as ‘you’ and the passing woman as ‘Bahnhof.’

The meme, which first went viral in summer 2017, was shared on Facebook alongside a caption encouraging people to apply for jobs as “salespeople, technicians and skilled web designers”.

However many people took offence with the use of the meme, with some commenting on Facebook that they thought it was “sexist” and “unprofessional.”

And the Swedish advertising watchdog has criticised the meme - which was shared on both Bahnhof’s Facebook and Instagram accounts - as being “gender-discriminatory” due to its depiction of women as “interchangeable” and “sex objects.”

After the advert was reported, Sweden’s Advertising Ombudsman came to a unanimous decision and made the following judgement: “It portrays women as interchangeable objects, and that only their appearance is interesting.”

The statement also pointed out that there was no clear link between the objectified image of women and Bahnhof as a company.

“According to the committee, the objectification is reinforced by the fact that women are designated as workplace representatives while the man, as the recipient of the advertisement, is being produced as an individual,” The Local reported the judgement as saying.

However they also pointed out that the meme is not just degrading to women but to men too: “It gives the impression that men might change female partners in the same way they change jobs. One notifier pointed out that Bahnhof may put off female applicants with the advertisement.”

The CEO of Bahnhof, Jon Karlung, released a statement in defence of the use of the meme, arguing that the aim was solely to make the company appear attractive “and that those who have a slightly less good employer could be interested in us.”

“Everyone who follows the internet and meme culture knows how the meme is used and interpreted,” the statement read. “[Whether someone is a] man, woman or neutral gender is often irrelevant in this context.

“We are an internet company and are conversant in this, as are those who would look for a job with us, so we turned to that target group. If we should be punished for anything, it’s for using an old and tired meme.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in