Devolution: curbing the power of Westminster that : LETTERS

Fred Catherwood
Monday 16 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Sir Fred Catherwood Sir: Maybe we should not be in a great hurry to have local government for Yorkshire or Greater London, but absolute power in Westminster is not offset, as it is in all other democracies, by local government entrenched in a written constitution.

Nor is it offset by any of the range of safeguards that other democracies have developed: an elected head of state with clear and accepted powers; the division of power which prevents government from bribing MPs by prospect of office; a democratic secondchamber representing the regions; an independent central bank which prevents them from buying elections by debasing the currency; a fixed electoral timetable which prevents them from a quick election when they are ahead at the polls.

But, above all, and most dangerously, we, uniquely, can still have governments which are elected on a minority of the popular vote.

Constitutions are a safeguard for rough weather. If, for instance, in times of rising unemployment, an English nationalist party gained a Commons majority with 35 per cent of the popular vote on a thinly-veiled racialist platform, we have to ask what would stand in their way.

And if we think that this is not plausible, we should visit some of the no-go areas on the housing estates of our great cities and wonder what would happen if a party came along which was prepared to organise the young unemployed, giving them something to live for and, if need be, something to fight for.

Yours sincerely, FRED CATHERWOOD Balsham, Cambridgeshire 13 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in