Dear John Birt: What on earth must I do to get a reply to my letter, an exasperated Radio 4 listener asks the BBC director general
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I have been very patient. What am I to do next to get a reply out
of the BBC? What is all this talk about accountability and customer response?
On 16 February I heard (as I often do) 'Thought for the Day' on the Today programme. The topic was the anniversary of the Rushdie fatwa and, as I listened, I thought the words of the speaker - a Sikh gentleman whose name I cannot spell as I have never seen it in print - were distressing and offensive. I rang the duty officer and tried to articulate my protest; I also asked for an address to write to. I wrote to it, at once. Nothing happened in response. A month later, on 16 March, I wrote again, and then again, on 25 March. I have heard nothing at all in reply to my letters. I did ask if the talk was scripted and, if so, could I see a copy of the script. I can see that this may have caused difficulty, but I should at least have received an acknowledgement while somebody wondered what to do next. Silence is unacceptable. A recent piece in the Independent ('The terrible bother of making a fuss', 6 April) assured me I should have received a reply within 10 days. So where is it?
I am genuinely puzzled. I really thought I would get a reply. The BBC is constantly soliciting me to write for it, speak on it, be interviewed by it - I have two requests pending even now, and a programme to make in May - but when I ask it a simple question I am ignored. Is this how you treat all your listeners and viewers, or is it just me?
I am quite a fan of the Today programme. It seems so friendly. And I am a connoisseur of the religious slot. I thought it was a bit of a mistake to allow somebody pretending to be a bishop to talk about rail privatisation on Good Friday of all days - I know it was April Fool's Day, too, but even as a non-Christian I thought this a poor joke - but I restrained myself from ringing the duty officer about this. Nor did I ring up when that comic rabbi lost his notes. I am a tolerant listener and I realise that live programmes run risks: clerics, like politicians, will sometimes get lost in radio cars or stuck on trains in the fog or make unfortunate remarks. What I wanted to know was what the speaker actually said on 16 February, and who knew he was going to say it. I still want to know. I want my right of reply.
I suppose I could have written to Feedback and provided your organisation with a bit of free copy. But I don't want to hear my views on Feedback. I want an answer to my letter. My memories of what I heard on 16 February over my morning coffee may become fuzzy with time. Perhaps what the Sikh gentleman said was less irresponsible than I thought. Then again, perhaps it was more so. Am I ever to find out?
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments