Twitter users criticise new 'consent condom' saying it 'won't prevent rape'

'The condom isn’t a contract'

Sarah Jones
Friday 05 April 2019 11:18 BST
Comments
Consent condoms take four hands to open

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Twitter users have condemned the release of a new condom that requires two people to open it simultaneously.

Tulipán, an Argentinian sex toy company, designed the new "consent condom" packet with the aim of ensuring both parties are equally involved in the decision to have sex.

The design works by requiring two people to simultaneously press special points on each side of the packet to access its contents.

The product officially launches later this year but the company has already started promoting it on social media and handing them out at bars in Buenos Aires for couples to test.

Tulipán’s advertisements for the condom include a series of videos on Twitter and Instagram that frame consent as key.

“Tulipán has always spoken of safe pleasure but for this campaign we understood that we had to talk about the most important thing in every sexual relationship — pleasure is possible only if you both give your consent,” says Joaquin Campins of BBDO, the agency tasked with promoting the condoms.

“If it’s not a yes, it’s a no,” he adds.

The invention has received mixed reactions on social media with many confused as to how the condom will deter a person from committing sexual assault.

“I'm going to go ahead and bet that someone who doesn't ask for consent is not going to let the lack of a condom stop them,” one person wrote on Twitter.

Another added: “She can still change her mind after the condom has been opened by both of you if she feels a certain way. Seek consent till the end guys. The condom isn’t a contract.”

A third person tweeted: “Seriously?!

“1. Amputees f**k as regularly as non-amputees. 2. Pretty sure someone who intends to rape isn't worried about condoms.3. Consent can be withdrawn at any time. Using this bulls**t isn't evidence of NOT rape.”

However, some social media users defended the condom, saying those opposed to it are “thinking about it from the wrong perspective”.

“It's not intended to prevent rape,” one person wrote.

“No still means no, even if you're wearing a mutually-opened condom. It just provides an additional layer of confidence in consent. Of course bad people can still do bad things.”

Another agreed, adding: “What a nice idea.”

Tulipán has said its “consent pack” was designed after AHF Argentina – an organisation campaigning for the rights of those living with HIV – revealed that only 14.5 per cent of Argentinian men regularly used a condom.

65 per cent said they occasionally used condoms, and 20.5 per cent said they’d never used a condom.

These findings follow the results of a major survey into rape by the End Violence Against Women Coalition (EVAW) in 2018 which revealed that a third of British people think it is not rape if women are pressured into sex without physical violence.

Similarly, one-third of people over 65 said they believed non-consensual sex with a long-term partner was not rape, despite the law professing it to be.

In 1991, a landmark court judgement removed marital exemption, ruling that within a marriage any non-consensual sexual activity is rape

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in