Chess

Jon Speelman
Saturday 05 February 2005 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Montreal "World Chess Tournament" took place from January 15th to 22nd in the Centre Saint-Laurent: a ten player all-play-all averaging a very healthy 2495 (category 10).

There were three Canadians IMs: Thomas Roussel-Roozmon, who was 17 a week before the tournament began, Jean Hebert and Eric Lawson; and, as you might expect in Quebec a couple of French grandmasters Igor-Alexandre Nataf and Arnaud Hauchard. While the other five comprised four more grandmasters - Dmitry Jakovenko (Russia), Victor Mikhalevski (Israel), John Fedorowicz (USA) and Rogelio Antonio (Phillipines) and IM Eugene Perelshteyn (USA).

Whereas high scores are usually essential in order to win Open tournaments, in which the top seeds normally start with a large plus score against weaker opposition, big scores in closed events are comparatively rare. However, Jakovenko totally ran away with the tournament dropping just two draws against Roussel-Rouzmon and Pelerelshteyn for a massive 8/9.

He was followed by Mikhalevski on 6; Nataf made 5.5, Perelshtein and Hauchard 5 and the rest were all on fifty percent or less.

Jakovenko has a fairly technical style and indeed three of his seven wins took over 70 moves but he did score one quick victory highlighting the importance of opening preparation in a computer-dominated age.

In this slightly odd line Black loses tempi with his bishop to prevent White from castling long. 19.Ne5! is the only move but it had been seen before and indeed Antonia only deviated from a game in the 2003 Hungarian Championship, in which Zoltan Gyimesi played the much better 20...Nd5 but lost to Peter Acs after a hard fight, when he played 20...Bxd2?.

This however, proved utterly disastrous and after 23.Nxf7! Rogelio was summarily mated.

Dmitry Jakovenko v Rogelio Antonio

Montreal 2005 (round 6)

Caro Kann

1.e4 c6

2.d4 d5

3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Bf5 5.Ng3 Bg6 6.h4 h6

7.Nf3 Nd7 8.h5 Bh7 9.Bd3 Bxd3 10.Qxd3 e6 11.Bf4 Qa5+ 12.Bd2 Bb4 13.c3 Be7 14.c4 Bb4 15.Ne4 Ngf6 16.Nd6+ Ke7 17.c5 b6 18.0-0 bxc5 19.Ne5 Nxe5 20.dxe5 Bxd2 21.exf6+ gxf6 22.Rad1 Bf4 23.Nxf7 Kxf7 24.Qg6+ 1-0

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in