Budget: Tax on Children's Savings

Nic Cicutti
Saturday 13 March 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PARENTS WHO have been using a loophole which allowed them to avoid paying tax when they transferred money to their children will no longer be able to do so following this week's Budget.

Up to now, if a parent opened a savings account in a child's name, the account was allowed to earn up to pounds 100 interest a year before it became subject to tax. However, many thousands of parents have used trust law to avoid this tax law. They have set up a "bare" or accumulation trust, which meant the income in the trust became the child's. In turn, this allowed the child's own tax allowance to be used, saving a parent up to pounds 1,678 a year in tax.

Many fund management firms, such as investment trusts, have tended to incorporate bare trusts within the children's savings schemes they offered to the public, costing the Inland Revenue up to pounds 50m a year in tax.

From this week, new bare trust arrangements, or money added to existing trusts, will no longer be sheltered from income tax, unless the income is less than pounds 100.

Nic Cicutti

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in