bridge

Alan Hiron
Friday 23 June 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Game all; dealer North

North

4 A Q J

! A Q 8

# A 9 3

2 9 8 7 6

West East

4 5 3 4 4 2

! 7 2 ! K J 10 9 6 4

# 8 6 4 2 # K Q 10 7

2 K Q J 4 3 2 2

South

4 K 10 9 8 7 6

! 5 3

# J 5

2 A 10 5

This deal came up recently in rubber bridge and in practice the defence was less than accurate, allowing declarer to execute a neat squeeze and make his contract. But who made the first mistake?

North opened One No-trump (15-17 points). East overcalled with Two Hearts, and South bid Three Spades.

With a good fit in his partner's suit, the opponent's suit well-guarded, and top cards, North might profitably have bid Three No-trumps where there were nine sure tricks. But he dutifully raised to Four Spades.

The lead of the seven of hearts left South with a problem: how could he avoid four losers? He started by covering the lead with dummy's eight. East won and pushed through the two of clubs - which looked very much like a singleton.

Without much hope, South won, drew trumps with the ace and queen, and exited with a club.

West took his two club tricks (which was perfectly good) and led a third top club (which was quite fatal! - He should have led another heart). Can you see how South took advantage of this error?

He ruffed, cashed the ace of diamonds (a Vienna coup) and played off his remaining trumps to squeeze East in the red suits.

I shall revisit this hand next week, but I will leave you with a problem: How could South have made his contract after the punishing heart lead?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in