Bridge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Love all; dealer South
North
4none
!Q 10 6
#A K J 9 7 4
2Q J 8 7
West East
4A 8 7 2 46 5 4 3
!K 8 5 3 !J 9 7 2
#10 6 5 3 #Q 2
22 29 4 3
South
4K Q J 10 9
!A 4
#8
2A K 10 6 5
I had a golden opportunity to enhance my reputation as a fearless opening leader when this deal was presented to me as a problem. Imagine that you are West and that you have heard the bidding (unopposed) go: 14-2#; 32-42; 4!-5NT; 72-pass. Against some opponents you would simply cash the ace of spades but you are told that this North-South pair knew exactly what they were doing.
Suppose that West makes a peaceful trump lead. Declarer makes his contract easily enough by drawing trumps and eventually falling back on the ruffing finesse in spades.
Now the bidding has given a number of clues. The only logical explanation of North's activities was that he was void in spades and, after hearing his partner's heart cue bid, was only interested in whether South held both 2A and 2K.
So how would declarer play if he was faced with the lead of 48? (Or, as a chess writer might put it, 48!?) Without a doubt, he would place East with 4A and so reject the ruffing finesse. To use the diamond suit, he would have to draw trumps and that would leave him needing six tricks from the diamonds where his best bet would be to take a first-round finesse of the jack.
I impressed my audience by finding the lead of 48 almost immediately but, being an honest player, I had to admit that I had been shown the full hand earlier in the day by a West who had hopefully started with 4A at the table.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments