A-Z of the digital world
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.T is for "Turing test". Alan Turing was a British mathematician who devised some important theoretical models for digital computers and their capabilities. In 1950 he proposed the litmus test for artificial intelligence: a machine could be called "intelligent", he suggested, if it could fool a human into believing that it too was human. To get over the problem of appearance, the conversation could be carried out via computer terminals.
Artificial intelligence (AI) gurus found the Turing test intriguing, and in 1964 Joseph Weizenbaum, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote Eliza - a program that behaved like a psychotherapist (one using non-directive therapy, mostly echoing what people say and picking up on mentions of parents).
People who didn't know Eliza was a program believed it was a person - a fact that Weizenbaum found worrying, though possibly it tells us more about psychotherapy than AI. Eliza was a milestone. But the question of whether a machine could persuade a sceptical observer it was human remained open.
In 1991 Hugh Loebner, a maker of disco-dancing floors, began sponsoring an annual contest with a $10,000 prize for anyone whose machine passed a limited Turing test: it would have to be proficient in only one subject (such as Star Trek, or cave-diving). A panel of judges talks with a series of pairs of terminals - one connected to a machine, the other to a person - and rates each on their level of "human-ness." Usually, the machines could be spotted easily - they didn't make spelling mistakes.
This year, the contest (held in April) was won by a program written by Jason Hutchens, of the Centre for Intelligent Information Processing Systems at the University of Western Australia. His HeX program "pretended" to be Australian. (Please, no snide comments about that making it easier.) Hutchens's Web page about it all can be found at .
Objectively, Hutchens's program seems rather capable. A sample dialogue:
PROGRAM: Well, should my age really matter? Just for the record I am 24. How old are you, then?
JUDGE: I'm 21.
PROGRAM: If you are 21, it's your business, mate! Would you like to hear a joke? Knock, knock ...
JUDGE: I don't much care for knock-knock jokes, but go on ...
PROGRAM: No, let me tell you one first. Knock, knock.
JUDGE: who's there?
PROGRAM: Cindy.
JUDGE: Cindy who?
PROGRAM: Cindy next judge in, please!
CHARLES ARTHUR
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments