Angelina Jolie victorious in legal custody battle with Brad Pitt
‘Matters that should have been disclosed were not disclosed,’ says lawyer for Angelina Jolie in custody battle with Brad Pitt
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Angelina Jolie has secured a win in the custody legal battle for her and ex-husband’s Brad Pitt’s six children.
Jolie, 46, successfully requested to disqualify the presiding judge in the case. This follows on from Judge John W Ouderkirk allegedly not properly declaring his business relationship with lawyers for Pitt, 57.
This means that the child custody case that was believed to be almost completed has been tossed out, and a new one will need to be arranged. No details were made public about the now-defunct custody agreement.
"Judge Ouderkirk’s ethical breach, considered together with the information disclosed concerning his recent professional relationships with Pitt’s counsel, might cause an objective person, aware of all the facts, reasonably to entertain a doubt as to the judge’s ability to be impartial. Disqualification is required," the ruling from the 2nd District Court read.
This comes after Jolie first asked the judge to disqualify himself in August 2020.
Lawyers for Pitt released a statement about Jolie’s request being granted by the court, saying the case was thrown out on “technical procedural issue” and alleged that Jolie was trying to sabotage the agreed-upon custody arrangement.
"The appeals court ruling was based on a technical procedural issue. The facts haven’t changed. There is an extraordinary amount of factual evidence which led the judge — and the many experts who testified – to reach their clear conclusion about what is in the children’s best interests," it read. “We will continue to do what’s necessary legally based on the detailed findings of what’s best for the children."
An attorney for Jolie said that the judge knew the rules and simply did not follow them regarding the court ruling on 23 July.
"If you’re going to play the role of a paid private judge you have to play by the rules and the rules are very clear, they require full transparency," said Robert Olson, a lawyer for Jolie. "Matters that should have been disclosed were not disclosed."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments