This is how the pandemic could contribute to a 2020 US presidential election scandal

Covid-19 and the use of mail-in votes mean that some pundits believe we could still be hashing out the results by the time the Thanksgiving Turkey is being carved, writes Dave MacLean

Thursday 06 August 2020 01:12 BST
Comments
Trump vs Biden in November will not be a quick affair
Trump vs Biden in November will not be a quick affair (AFP via Getty)

I was still living in London during the 2016 US election.

I recall waking up in the early hours, seeing that Donald Trump was on course for victory, and thinking I was still dreaming.

An hour later, after a brief doze, the unthinkable was confirmed.

I use this to illustrate what not to expect on election night this November: speed.

We’re all used to fairly rapidly moving denouements after votes have been cast both in the US and the UK.

Exit polls come out once the polls have closed, within an hour or so people have drawn conclusions from the size of the ballot piles in front of the counters, and an hour or two later, the area in question has called it.

Then, within a few hours, the whole election is called with a winner announced and a loser conceding.

Not so this year. Covid-19 and the likely mass use of mail-in votes mean that some pundits have speculated that the result could still be inconclusive by the time the Thanksgiving Turkey is being carved.

This is new territory – people are used to being given near-instant election results and some may jump to suspicions of foul play when counting drags on for days or weeks.

That leaves the media in a critical position, more so than ever.

First, readers need to be briefed – clearly and repeatedly – in the run-up to the election that a delayed result is expected, accounted for, and not the result of a conspiracy or foul play.

The second responsibility is to present after-the-fact arguments by both sides fairly. Given the combative nature of the current president, the new territory of mass mail-in voting, and the high-stakes nature of this election, there’s a chance this could end up before the Supreme Court.

The court does not operate in a vacuum, as much as those who sit on it would probably like to think, and both Democrats and Republicans will be using post-election briefings, statements and interviews to “work the refs” in their favour.

Forget “election night”, prepare for “election month”.

Yours,

Dave Maclean

US features editor

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in