What is going to happen to the Fixed-term Parliaments Act?
Nobody likes the law that paralysed parliament last year – but, asks John Rentoul, what to replace it with?
A joint committee of MPs and peers met for the first time last week. It has been set up, as required by the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, to review the act and recommend whether to repeal or amend it.
It seems a bit pointless, because Boris Johnson promised in last year’s Conservative manifesto to “get rid” of the act, because “it has led to paralysis at a time the country needed decisive action”. The Labour Party agreed; its manifesto said: “A Labour government will repeal the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, which has stifled democracy and propped up weak governments.”
Nobody likes the act, agreed by the coalition government as a sop to the Liberal Democrats, who feared that David Cameron would call a snap election when it suited him in the hope of ditching his ball and chain. It turned out that the two-thirds majority required for an early election could be overridden by a simple majority for a new act, as happened last year, but that the fixed-term act nevertheless encouraged deadlock and indecision.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments