David Cameron's speech to Tory Party conference was boring, well delivered and basically irrelevant
The Prime Minister was hampered by timing. In the event, he produced platitudes and familiar tropes, but he can't really be blamed for not being more specific with policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Well, that was one hell of a mid-term speech. What of it will we remember in six months’ time – or, for that matter, six weeks? Not much.
The Prime Minister was hampered by timing. Halfway through a parliament is not an easy time to deliver a rousing speech. It’s not long enough to look back over the whole sweep of a term in office; nor close enough to an impending election to rally troops by laying out policy positions. As such, it was exceptionally light on detail, full of familiar foes, and over-burdened by cliché and lazy thinking.
Two examples: first, after saying that Iain Duncan Smith’s welfare reforms were as grand in scope as those of Beveridge – which is wrong, hubristic, and premature – Cameron identified the two primary evils of welfare as unfairness and injustice. But these two words are often used inter-changeably, including by philosophers, so when used in close succession really need a more obvious explanation of difference.
Second, in a tired attack on Labour’s borrow-and-spend culture, Cameron said that “We’re here because they [Labour] spent too much and borrowed too much. How can the answer be more spending and more borrowing.” I’m afraid this really is reductive, sloppy economics of the worst kind. As Martin Wolf has pointed out, in an important sense this claim is the reverse of the truth. What matters is who adds the debt and in what form.
The only slightly memorable line today was “I’m not here to defend privilege; I’m here to spread it.” And the section recalling his father’s stoicism through disability was moving.
But overall it was a boring speech, effectively delivered, less significant than Ed Miliband’s speech, and as I wrote in the Evening Standard earlier this week, almost certainly utterly irrelevant to the very great majority of the British public.
I’d give it 5/10.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments