Leading article: A new smile that keeps an old secret
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The discovery of a picture, believed to be the earliest copy of the Mona Lisa, has prompted a discussion about whether the existence of a contemporary copy might in some way devalue the original. Is one Mona Lisa worth more or less if there are two, and what if there were more?
If the two were identical in every detail, then it could be argued that the "original" had lost some of its cachet; there could even be a vituperative artistic row about which – the Louvre's or the Prado's – came first. But they are not identical. The chief value of the copy, so the experts say, resides in its better condition, which leaves – perhaps – a more faithful impression of the sitter. The more remarkable truth, however, is that the presumed pupil captures the same enigmatic smile as did the master. The mystery is thus deepened, rather than explained. No value, monetary or otherwise, is lost or gained; the real Mona Lisa keeps her secret.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments