Judges halt plan to 'name and shame' criminals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A controversial "name and shame" campaign using posters of convicted criminals has been put on hold after the High Court ruled that the police initiative may be illegal.
Essex Police had wanted to publish a photograph and details of Gary Ellis, a 28-year-old burglar, on about 40 posters around the offender's home town of Brentwood. But yesterday Lord Woolf, the Lord Chief Justice, questioned the legality of using criminals with children in the scheme.
The decision followed a legal challenge by lawyers representing Ellis, who is divorced with a five-year-old daughter. Ellis was jailed for three and a half years last July after pleading guilty to 11 offences, including burglary and theft, and asked for 18 other offences of dishonesty to be taken into consideration.
Lord Woolf, sitting with Mr Justice Goldring, refused to rule out the general idea of poster schemes, but they expressed concern over the damage which might be suffered by children, who also had the right to protection of their private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The judges said: "It does not need much imagination to see how a poster campaign in relation to a child's father could produce unfortunate reactions in the playground of the child's school."
The judges said the court could not give the scheme the go-ahead without further reappraisal, and until more information was available "the light must remain at amber".
Essex Police said they had already decided not to use Ellis's photograph, partly because his case has already been widely publicised as a result of the court challenge. The police said they were pleased that the judges had not "closed the door" on the scheme.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments