Derek Smith
The managing director and chairman of London Underground responds to an article by Ken Livingstone about safety on the Tube
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It may come as a surprise to those relishing a public squabble ("The safety signals on the Tube that can no longer be ignored", 29 August), but Ken Livingstone and I yesterday found ourselves vehemently agreeing on the overarching importance of safety on the Tube.
It may come as a surprise to those relishing a public squabble ("The safety signals on the Tube that can no longer be ignored", 29 August), but Ken Livingstone and I yesterday found ourselves vehemently agreeing on the overarching importance of safety on the Tube.
Understandably, he is concerned that the Public Private Partnership (PPP) may be importing undue risk into the system. My job is clear: to make sure that does not happen and that risks are controlled - whatever their cause.
London Underground safety is driven through a process of continual review and improvement that has brought enormous advances to the culture of safety permeating the organisation.
Improvements must be dynamic and progressive. They also need to be constantly tested and audited. The immediate lessons of Paris yesterday are the same as the long-term lessons of King's Cross 13 years ago, namely, that safety cannot be taken for granted.
While it is encouraging to note that the level of risk and fatality on the Tube now is 11 times lower than a decade ago, there is no room for complacency. That is why it is so important that we continue the robust dialogue with our safety regulators. This dialogue is all too fleetingly being exposed to public scrutiny on the back of the PPP debate.
Responsibility for the operational safety of London Underground will remain in the public sector and with me. I am in charge of safety, and my team will continue to work closely with Her Majesty's Railway Inspectorate. As long as that scrutiny continues - in public or in private - I will continue to feel comfortable about looking my customers in the eye as I travel alongside them on the Underground today, tomorrow and in future.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments