BBC's Newsbeat reprimanded for letting Isis fighter compare jihad to Call of Duty

Youth news show criticised by BBC Trust

BBC Radio 1's Newsbeat bulletin has been rapped for breaching broadcasting rules after airing an interview with Isis fighter Kabir Ahmed, in which he boasted that waging war in the Middle East was 'fun' and better than playing the violent video game Call (PA)

Newsbeat, BBC Radio’s youth-orientated news service, has committed a “serious breach” of editorial guidelines by broadcasting an interview with a British jihadi who compared fighting for the terrorist group Islamic State to playing a computer game.

The BBC Trust said Newsbeat had a “responsibility to protect children and young people from unsuitable content” and that the broadcast should have come with an appropriate warning for Radio 1 listeners, many of whom are at school.

In the piece, broadcast last June, Newsbeat used a clip from an online video called The Isis Podcast, in which a young British man using the name Abu Sumayyah Al-Britani talked of the pleasures of jihad.

The Isis fighter was introduced as “speaking from an internet café near his training camp in north-west Syria”. A Newsbeat reporter said: “Some say Isis is overtaking Al Qaeda as one of the world’s most dangerous jihadist organisations. Sumayyah believes what they are fighting for is right.”

The terrorist was then heard saying: “It’s actually quite fun. Better than, how you’d say, what’s that game called, Call of Duty. It’s like that but really… 3D you know. You can see everything that’s happening in front of you, you know it’s real, you know what I mean?”

The Trust found that Newsbeat had also failed to sufficiently challenge the statements put forward in the Isis video and had failed to meet the BBC Editorial Guideline that demands that “contributors expressing contentious views, either through an interview or other means, must be rigorously tested”.

The BBC executive argued that the film gave young listeners “a rare and valuable opportunity to understand through first-hand testimony the motivation of an individual who had chosen to fight with Isis”.

But it accepted that the report “should have been preceded by a warning” and that “more contextual information” should have been included. It stressed that the film was not an Isis propaganda vehicle but a podcast produced by two freelance journalists studying the terror group.