Natalie Haynes: Turn the 100 metres into the 50 metres

Wednesday 07 December 2011 11:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Even though I don't balance budgets for a living, I do know that if you double them, that makes them bigger. So this immediately makes me better qualified to balance the Olympic budget than Hugh Robertson, the sports minister. He fondly believes that the £500m contingency fund will easily cover the fact that the security costs alone have almost doubled from £282m to £553m.

And that's before the Prime Minister stepped in to double the budget for the opening and closing ceremonies (that's four ceremonies in total – Olympics and Paralympics). Oddly, this isn't being seen as a massive waste of cash which might more profitably be used on virtually anything. Hugh Robertson said it was to "drive the maximum benefit for the economy and for tourism. It's about the impression that people take away of this country."

He seems impervious to the fact that the main impression they are likely to take away is that we can't tank as much money on fireworks as the Chinese did four years ago.

With more than half the contingency fund gobbled up on these two things alone, I suggest we may need to cut corners from other parts of the Games if they're still to come in on budget. We need to scale down our ambitions a bit. First, we should reduce the Olympic rings from five to three. And let's give the torch-relay a miss, too – fuel isn't cheap, you know. We could just cadge a light off some bloke in the crowd at the opening ceremony: that should be fine.

We'll need to apply a bit of austerity to the events themselves, obviously. Usain Bolt can run in the men's 50 metres, and that will be just as good. Chances are, he'll go even faster than he does in the 100m, so that's bound to create some of those good impressions the government is keen on.

We should also make sure we don't waste money on expensive racing bikes when the Boris bikes can be hired for a few quid a time. Given that they weigh roughly the same amount as a small car, the athleticism required to get them uphill in a road race will be all the more impressive.

Finally, the long jump requires a large sandpit for the competitors to land in. This could be provided in a time-share with the nursery schools of Newham, which could also do with a nice big sandpit. Extra points will be awarded if a jump results in the discovery of a missing piece of Lego. If enough Lego is found, we could use that to build the podium for the athletes to receive their medals. And, as for those, I'll have some chocolate coins going cheap in January.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in