Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Prince's naked pictures cause a stir

 

Thursday 23 August 2012 10:12 BST
Comments
Harry, the party-loving prince
Harry, the party-loving prince (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

St James's Palace yesterday asked British media organisations not to publish pictures of a naked Prince Harry partying in Las Vegas, despite the images being available online.

Royal aides confirmed the authenticity of the photographs, which depict the third-in-line to the throne standing in front of a topless woman, cupping his genitals with his hands. Another picture shows the Prince "bear-hugging" a naked woman from behind.

The pictures, initially published by tmz.com, were taken by a fellow reveller while Harry was reportedly playing "strip billiards" in his VIP suite.

The reluctance of UK tabloids to publish the images was attributed to the inquiry by Lord Leveson into press practices following the phone-hacking scandal.

While St James's Palace refused to comment on the pictures, aides informed newspaper editors that the photos were shot in circumstances where Prince Harry "had a reasonable expectation of privacy". Publication would constitute an "unjustified intrusion" into Harry's privacy, in breach of the Press Complaints Commission Editors' Code of Practice, the Palace argued.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in