Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Mona Lisa's elusive smile has enthralled visitors to the Louvre for generations, but yesterday a Swiss foundation unveiled what it said was an earlier version of Leonardo Da Vinci's masterpiece, claiming it was completed over a decade before the famous Renaissance painting.
The work, known as the Isleworth Mona Lisa, was exhibited publicly in Geneva by the Mona Lisa Foundation, which claims that 35 years of research, numerous tests and mathematical comparisons have led experts to conclude that it predated the Louvre painting by 11 to 12 years.
Stanley Feldman, an art historian, whose book Mona Lisa: Leonardo's Earlier Version was published yesterday, insisted that all the evidenced suggested that the work was the first Mona Lisa.
"We have investigated this painting from every relevant angle and the all the accumulated information points to it being an earlier version of the Giaconda in the Louvre," he said.
The foundation, which has been working with the anonymous owners of the Isleworth Mona Lisa, claim that the younger Mona Lisa was probably painted around 1505. That has been backed by the leading Italian Da Vinci specialist, Alessandro Vezzosi and the America-based Renaissance expert, Carlo Pedretti.
However other Da Vinci specialists remain highly sceptical. "The Isleworth Mona Lisa mis-translates subtle details of the original, including the sitter's veil, her hair, the translucent layer of her dress, the structure of the hands," insisted Martin Kemp, an Oxford University professor and acclaimed authority on the Renaissance painter. "The landscape is devoid of atmospheric subtlety. The head, like all other copies, does not capture the profound elusiveness of the original."
The painting was found in 1913 by the collector Hugh Blaker in an English manor house, where it had hung unnoticed for a century. He then took it to his home in the London suburb of Isleworth.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments