Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
He may be the figurehead of a religious cult whose theology centres on a science-fiction writer's claim that an alien warlord called Xenu invaded Earth 75 million years ago. But Tom Cruise takes a dim view of weird and wacky stories that happen to be written about him.
The actor has told lawyers to seek "hundreds of millions of dollars" in damages from the National Enquirer magazine over what he calls "disgusting lies" in its latest front-page story, headlined: "Inside Tom's HOUSE OF HORRORS!"
Cruise's attorney, Bert Fields, told the tabloid's publisher, American Media, in a three-page letter that he intended to go to war over "false and defamatory assertions" in the behind-the-scenes account of his life with Katie Holmes. It comes two days after Cruise, 50, finalised terms of his divorce from his 33-year-old third wife. It also marks his first attempt to rebut a wave of negative publicity spawned by the split, much of which has focused on the Church of Scientology's role in the life of the couple's daughter Suri, six.
"Your cover announces, as a fact, that 'THE REAL TOM IS A MONSTER'," Mr Fields informed the Enquirer's senior legal counsel, Cameron Stracher. "Mr Cruise is certainly not a 'monster'. He is a caring father, a hardworking actor, and above all, an honest, decent man."
The letter went on to describe as "egregious lies" the Enquirer's claim that Cruise forced Suri to spend five months sleeping in a "tiny, windowless room". Rather, Mr Fields insisted: "She slept in a nursery adjoining their bedroom. It has a window."
The Enquirer has yet to respond. US libel law generally prevents tabloids from being successfully sued. Mr Field was apparently leaked a copy of the magazine before publication.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments