Broadcaster Gaunt loses appeal overon-air 'Nazi' gibe
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The broadcaster Jon Gaunt, who called an interviewee a "Nazi" on air, lost an appeal yesterday against a High Court ruling that the media watchdog Ofcom was justified in upholding complaints against him.
Gaunt's contract was terminated in November 2008 by TalkSport, 10 days after an exchange with Redbridge councillor Michael Stark.
During a hearing last month, the Court of Appeal was told that Gaunt's live interview with Mr Stark about Redbridge Council's decision to ban smokers from becoming foster parents – for which he later apologised – drew 53 complaints from listeners.
Mr Stark said the welfare of children should outweigh the needs of foster families but Gaunt, who was himself in care, accused the councillor of being a "Nazi", a "health Nazi" and an "ignorant pig".
Last summer, Gaunt challenged Ofcom's June 2009 finding that the interview failed to comply with the broadcasting code, but the High Court backed Ofcom.
Three Court of Appeal judges yesterday rejected his appeal against the High Court's decision.
Giving the ruling of the court, the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, said: "When one combines the extremely aggressive tone of the interview, the constant interruptions, the insults, the ranting, the consequent lack of any substantive content, and the time which the interview was allowed to run on, it seems to me clear that Ofcom was right to conclude that there had been a breach of ... the code."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments