Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The London arm of Goldman Sachs paid only £4.1 million in corporation tax to the Treasury last year despite making pre-tax profits of £1.92 billion, annual accounts have revealed.
Goldman Sachs International (GSI) had a corporation tax bill of £422.3 million but it deferred £418.2 million – or more than 99 per cent of the amount – that it had to pay immediately in "current tax".
The Wall Street giant, presided over by Lloyd Blankfein, pictured, was able to postpone payment because of "timing differences", according to the accounts.
Goldman's decision will be a blow to the Treasury's coffers as Chancellor George Osborne battles to reduce the Government's deficit.
There is no suggestion GSI is seeking to avoid corporation tax by deferring payment. However, GSI's tax activities have come under scrutiny after it emerged last year that Inland Revenue (IR) boss Dave Hartnett had "let off" the bank to the tune of £10 million. Hartnett insisted to MPs that "a mistake had been made". He is retiring this summer.
Labour MP John Mann, a member of the Commons Treasury Select Committee, said GSI should not defer tax payments when it could hand over the cash now. "It's morally and ethically wrong. These are people who are at the heart of the problem in the financial world who've paid extraordinary bonuses to their partners and aren't prepared to pay a fair amount of tax. It's pure unadulterated greed."
A GSI spokesman said: "The firm has set aside $684m [£422m] for tax , but has no discretion over the timing of actual tax paid in any one year, as this is determined by UK accounting and tax rules."
GSI's dispute with the IR, which led to the £10m "let-off", was thought to involve national insurance on UK staff bonuses and did not cover corporation tax.
UK Uncut Legal Action, which campaigns against tax avoidance, is reported to be planning to challenge the IR's £10m "let-off" in court in June.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments