Solar industry takes tariff battle to House of Lords
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Solar industry campaigners have their last chance to save much-needed subsidies today as lawmakers meet to decide if the Government's controversial cuts warrant a debate in the House of Commons.
The Merits Committee, chaired by Lord Goodlad, is to consider a letter co-signed by some 58 organisations and businesses – including the Solar Trade Association, the Co-operative, and the Town and Country Planning Association – calling for a re-think of Government plans to slash the "feed-in tariff" (FiT) scheme barely more than year after it was introduced.
If the committee votes to draw "special attention" to the concerns outlined in the letter, it will trigger a parliamentary debate and vote on the Government's proposals branded "nonsensical" and "a horrendous strategic mistake" by the irate solar industry.
The proposed changes to cut the subsidy rates available to solar power projects of more than 50 kilowatts (kW) – roughly the size of a hospital or housing association scheme – by between 38 and 70 per cent. If the changes go ahead the industry argues it is unlikely any projects of more than 50kW will be built.
Much of debate centres on the comparative cost of solar power. A report from the independent Climate Change Committee last month backed new nuclear reactors as the cheapest option for the green power Britain needs to hit ambitious carbon-reduction targets. But the solar industry virulently disputes the point, claiming that solar costs should be compared with retail rather than wholesale prices, because of the scale of the technology.
A report from Ernst & Young yesterday suggests that solar will compete with retail grid prices as soon as mid-2012, if current subsidy levels are maintained, rather than the mid-2016 "parity" point with wholesale costs.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments