Simon English: What's going on? The computers are in charge now
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In Robert Harris's The Fear Index, a socially hopeless physicist with a brain too large for his own good devises an algorithmic trading machine that is remarkably adept at predicting moves in financial markets. As a high-frequency trader, the computer doesn't much care what is going to happen tomorrow, it intends to make a turn in the next hour, minute or millisecond.
This being a novel, you know the computer is going to go wrong. It's so advanced it gets smarter, keeps learning how to better make such astonishing profits that it begins to threaten the existence of global markets. Moreover, as it learns how to ensure it survives even if not much else does, it takes on (seemingly) human qualities. Whether artificial intelligence could take over the world we'll leave to theoretical physicists and Steven Spielberg.
What seems a matter of fact is that machines very like Harris's VIXAL-4 now drive most markets. Human traders simply can't keep up, which raises the question of whether they have a future, of what they are for.
Perhaps City of London trading floors in 10 years' time will consist of nothing but banks of computers and one man whose job it is to turn them on and off. Stockbrokers or fund mangers looking to take a longer-term view, to prepare a client for retirement or meet a pension fund obligation in 30 years' time, would still seem to have a role.
The thing is, even these people are supposed to have a view on what markets might do in the short term, or at least explain why they did what they just did. If such moves are being driven by algorithms, what's the use of any human financial or economic analysis unless it is an impenetrable series of maths equations?
At the moment, global events are so skittish, even before computers start doing mysterious things at the speed of light, that even old hands admit they are at a loss.
I asked an experienced market-maker yesterday morning what was happening that day. He repeated what he said he had just told his best client. "We are rangebound with a slight bias to the downside." And that means? "I've no idea what's happening."
What's the market doing in the next few days? "Searching for direction," say the supposed experts about the hiatus in the FTSE. "Search me," they say in private. Even the human trend-spotters, the computer-mimickers, admit that the patterns they are paid to spot are all over the place.
The most thoughtful calculations become guesswork in the face of a eurozone crisis being traded by 50,000 supercomputers.
Ten years ago, if you asked a City market-maker why a stock had finished sharply up or down, they could probably give the right reason. Lately, you can sense them trying to come up with something plausible rather than something they know to be true.
Where is all of this heading? Nowhere good. Ask Robert Harris.
What seems a matter of fact is that machines drive most markets. Human traders simply can't keep up
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments