Simon English: If you're mad now at what financiers make, wait a bit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The phrase "shareholder spring" has already become a cliché that should probably be banned by all self-respecting journals.
We really won't know for sure whether it is a meaningful revolution, in other words a genuine shift in the continuing power relationship between owners and managers, until Vince Cable's law making protest votes on pay binding becomes law (if it ever does).
I'm going to guess that this is just a blip. In retrospect I reckon it will turn out to have been a brief period when some companies' performance was so awful than even City fund managers felt obliged to at least make a show of being annoyed at executive pay.
The so-called shareholder spring will only turn into an investors' autumn if chief executive pay becomes genuinely linked to performance, or else just shoved notably downwards.
Most likely what will occur is that there will continue to be a serious-looking "rebellion" every once in a while that will allow small shareholders to feel that their views are taken seriously. To give the impression that this is a fair fight. Meanwhile the City gravy train will peep-peep along as normal.
One national newspaper has been writing – by my reckoning – the following story at least once a week for the last 10 years: Major clampdown on executive pay imminent.
Given that these stories appeared during a period when executive pay boomed and kept on booming, you could see the relentless pursuit of them as doggedly heroic, if, sadly, completely wrong.
Isolated cases aside, the way to bet is that executive pay will keep rising in the next few years, especially for bankers. The pay deals coming down the line for top banking bosses are truly extraordinary. If you think you're mad now at what financiers make – wait a bit.
That's because five years ago, before the crash, bankers' bonuses and pay were mostly in cash. Almost as if they thought bank shares were overvalued.
Now there's been a shift to insist that bankers take payment in shares which are presently undervalued.
When the Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group properly recover and the shares return to something like normal, the payouts Executive will be phenomenal.
Chief executives not in banking will point to those rewards and say, hey, that's the new going rate for folk such as me ... Remuneration committees will buckle.
Steam will emerge from the ears of Vince Cable and others who expect life to be equitable.
Everyone else will shrug: same as it ever was. Just a bit worse.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments