Retail and investment arms 'must be totally separated'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain is running the risk of bankers chipping away at the Sir John Vickers' reforms until they are rendered useless, the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards was warned by the architect of the bank America's regulatory reforms.
Sir John's report called for retail banking operations to be "ring fenced" from more risky investment banking.
But Paul Volcker, the former chief of US Federal Reserve, said: "It (Sir John's report) says they are going to have a ring fence but they are going to have exceptions.
"Once you do this and you have exceptions the banks will say, yes well, lets make this one a little bigger because it is getting awkward."
Mr Volcker said Sir John's aims were the same as those contained in his Volcker rule, which bans US banks from proprietary trading, or using their own funds to place bets in the financial markets.
But he said: "Based on the American experience, the concept that different subsidiaries of a single commercial banking organisation can maintain total independence either in practice or in public perception is difficult to sustain.
"If you want to separate operations clearly and decisively you put them in different organisations."
Mr Volcker rounded on critics of his own rules, notable among them JP Morgan's chief executive Jamie Dimon, who has railed against it in a long letter to his shareholders.
He said that the rule was only "about 35 pages" long with a similar appendix. The only reason it mushroomed to over 300 was as a result of needing to "answer questions put by lobbyists".
The rule is a key part of the US Dodd-Frank banking reforms, which Mitt Romney, the Republican Presidential candidate, has pledged to repeal if he wins the election.
Paul Volcker also renewed his attack yesterday on the destructive culture and bonus practices banks had allowed to build up.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments