'Resist EU's bid to restrict high-frequency trading'

Wednesday 24 October 2012 09:55 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

European plans to restrict high-frequency trading (HFT) – the computer-driven, millisecond dealing in shares – should be resisted, according to a UK government-sponsored report.

Sir John Beddington, the chief scientific adviser to the Government, who led the investigation, said that while there was probably a need for greater regulation over high-frequency trading, only two of the EU's nine suggestions would be effective.

The report found no direct evidence that HFT, on which Robert Harris, pictured, based his bestseller The Fear Index, increased volatility, nor signs that it has led to an increase in market abuse.

But it also noted that HFT may have only "modestly improved the functioning of markets in some respects" and had some "possible effects on instability in financial markets". Such computer-based systems account for 30 per cent of equity trading in the UK and possibly as much as 60 per cent in the US.

Christian Voigt, at the trading-technology group Fidessa, said: "HFT firms have been widely vilified in recent months, though the reasons most typically given are, in fact, based on popular misconceptions."

Joe Saluzzi, from Themis Trading in New Jersey, told Radio 4's Today programme that the problem with the computer systems is that "they don't care".

"There is no investment banking, no research, no sales and trading; they are just there to make money," he said. "That is why the structure of the market has changed so much… and it's not a good thing."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in