'Government should sell RBS and Lloyds stakes at a loss'

Matt Scuffham
Wednesday 16 May 2012 09:54 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government should sell part of its stakes in state-backed lenders Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland at a loss to kickstart a disposal process that should see investors pay more at later offerings, a senior Rothschild banker told MPs yesterday.

"It is a good strategy to start a disposal programme with the first tranche at the lowest price," said Adam Young, joint head of equity advisory at Rothschild. "The loss is worth taking today because it is part of a programme," he told the Treasury Select Committee, which was taking evidence on the potential disposal of government stakes in Lloyds and RBS.

Taxpayers are sitting on a loss of more than £25bn from its £45bn rescue of RBS in 2008. It also faces a £12bn loss on Lloyds after pumping in £20bn to save that business.

Mr Young said there was concern among investors that RBS senior management could be hounded out by media and public fury over pay rewards before restoring the bank to health.

RBS's chairman Philip Hampton, pictured, and chief executive Stephen Hester waived their 2011 bonuses after politicians from across the board called on them to refuse the awards.

Robert Talbut, the chairman of the Association of British Insurers, told the committee he too was worried by the furore that surrounded Mr Hester's pay award and the perception of government interference in general.

"The company is still susceptible to being run as a political football," he said. "Its ability to retain a commercial management team is going to be severely inhibited if [RBS management] do not believe they are going to receive a significant market rate."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in