Goldman Sachs starts search for 'muppet' emails

Simon English,Stephen Foley
Friday 23 March 2012 11:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Goldman Sachs is combing through staff emails to see if anyone ever referred to the bank's clients as "muppets", as alleged by the renegade employee Greg Smith last week.

The hunt was ordered by the chief executive, Lloyd Blankfein, following the dramatic resignation of Mr Smith last week, which he delivered in the form of a highly embarrassing opinion piece in the New York Times.

There is a "toxic and destructive" environment at Goldman, Mr Smith wrote, in which clients are regarded as no more than sources of profit and are often referred to in derogatory ways by bankers and traders.

His piece was notable in particular for bringing attention to the fact that British people use "muppet" to mean a stupid person. He said traders would often call their clients "muppets", sometimes even in internal emails.

On the conference call with partners this week, Mr Blankfein, pictured, said the company was taking Mr Smith's claims seriously and was conducting a review of his assertions, including the email scan.

It was not clear when the email search would be completed or what actions, if any, Goldman would take if the search does turn up derogatory comments. The bank declined to comment beyond the statement from Mr Blankfein and his deputy, Gary Cohn, last week, in which they noted: "In a company of our size, it is not shocking that some people could feel disgruntled. But that does not and should not represent our firm of more than 30,000 people."

Mr Smith's claim that the culture of Goldman has radically changed has been disputed. Some say that Goldman has always existed to maximise its own profits and that clients have always understood this. Alan Sklover, a New York employment lawyer, said that Mr Smith is unlikely to be bound by the sort of "non-disparagement" clauses that would be typical if he had negotiated his exit or received a pay-off.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in