Both sides claim victory in Interflora legal battle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Interflora and Marks & Spencer both claimed victory yesterday in their legal battle over whether M&S can use Interflora trademarks as keywords to trigger adverts on the search engine Google for the retailer's own flower delivery service.
The UK arm of Interflora said it was "delighted" by the European Union Court of Justice's ruling that a trademark is "adversely affected" where the advert causes confusion among consumers that these services originate from the proprietor. But the court also ruled that online ads using such keywords that provide an alternative to the goods or services of the trademarks' owner, were "within the ambit of fair competition". The High Court will make a final ruling next year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments