Banks attacked for their account switiching policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Independent Commission on Banking is under attack for failing to push for portable bank accounts – a reform that campaigners say would free consumers to switch banks and increase the efficiency of the economy.
As well as making the financial system safer, the ICB's remit included encouraging competition and consumer choice. But the commission barely touched on the idea of letting bank customers transport their account number if they switch account.
Pressure on the banks to treat consumers better will also increase today with the Treasury Select Committee's call for Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group to stop restricting basic account holders' access to other banks' cash machines. Which? argues that the ICB should have carried out a full analysis of the costs and benefits of portable accounts. Dominic Lindley, a policy adviser at Which?, said: "Although portable accounts would have costs for the banks, there would be benefits for every business in the country, for government departments and, of course, for consumers because it would be far less likely for things to go wrong."
Instead of calling for portable accounts, the ICB recommended a redirection service. Which? says this will help smooth switching but will do little to reduce costs or overcome people's wariness about the potential for things to go wrong when changing banks. It warns that banks will sit back unless they are forced to make changes.
The chairman of the Treasury Select Committee has today written to Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group raising concerns about their decisions not to let basic account holders use other banks' cash machines.
Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the committee, said: "This change threatens to leave many basic account holders at the two banks unable to access most cash machines in the UK. This could also signal the end of universal access to cash machines for all customers."
RBS announced its plan to restrict cash machine use for basic account customers in August. Lloyds already had limits in place.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments