19 best women’s running shoes to clock up the miles, tried and tested

Energy is the order of the day in this super-responsive shoe. It’s billed as having structured cushioning but, while you feel the benefit of the cushioning over the miles, it doesn’t feel dull, instead giving superb energy return.

The support is reassuringly present but it’s on the less extreme side – you could probably run in this shoe if you’re a neutral runner, especially if your form slips as you get tired. It’s an extremely comfortable, lightweight shoe with great arch support, a secure and supportive heel cup, and the toebox houses a relatively wide foot (but not for the widest of feet).

Its midsole geometry makes it feel like it’s almost doing the running for you, propelling you forward. An absolute joy to run in.

We recognise that "budget" might be a stretch of the definition for something that’s over £100 but, relative to the general market, this shoe comes in at the cheaper end but still has good technology and performance.

It’s a neutral shoe that we found to be responsive and shock absorbing, making it an enjoyable ride and ideal for daily running of reasonable distances. It’s light for a cushioned shoe and comfortable – the upper is roomy and flexible, which we like but you may not if you like your forefoot to be held down more.

Our only gripe is that the lacing comes up quite high without a padded tongue and we found that it pushed into the front of our ankle, but we resolved it by not lacing up to the top eyelets.

This is a versatile, lightweight and maximally cushioned neutral shoe, which we found very comfortable for steady distances.

However, it’s also responsive and propulsive enough for speed training and racing, thanks to its carbon composite plate designed for “maximum energy transfer and optimised running efficiency”, and 6mm heel-to-toe drop.

Some people opt for two or more pairs of shoes for different types of training or racing but if, like most people, you can’t afford that, then this is a great option for fulfilling various roles. It’s worth noting that this shoe is on the narrow side, so won’t suit those with a wider foot.

We’ve yet to test an iteration of this iconic shoe that didn’t impress us and this is no exception. New Balance has added more cushioning, resulting in a greater stack height but while some highly cushioned shoes can feel a bit too cushy and slightly deadened, not so for the 1080.

In fact, while it’s a shoe we’d choose for burning up the miles at a steady pace, we also find it just about responsive enough for shorter, faster runs and its slight rocker shape makes for a smooth roll-through.

This shoe was also voted our Fitness and wellbeing editor’s favourite for road running. Read the full review here.

The only issue we could find with this shoe is that if you overpronate at all or have a tendency to roll your ankles, this runner probably won’t provide you with what you need.

The fit is snug and feels great on the foot and ankle but you might want to consider opting for at least half a size up from your street shoe size.

This is Altra’s best-selling road shoe and it’s about as comfortable as it’s possible for a shoe to be. If you’re a wide-footed runner and you’re used to many running shoes compressing the sides of your feet, you’ll sigh with relief as you slip your foot into this style.

It’s not just for wide feet, though – the toe box is designed to allow your toes to spread naturally as you run. The low stack (height from the ground) makes for great ground feel if that’s what you like. It’s a neutral shoe and has a 0mm drop, so be sure to up your miles gradually if you haven’t run in shoes like this before.

The cushioning runs along the shoe and it absorbs impact nicely with decent energy return. An extra thumbs up for the soft, plush heel collar, too. This isn’t a shoe for shaving off time in a race but it’s great for comfortable daily runs. 

This is a neutral shoe that comes down at the lower end of running-shoe cost. It has a decent amount of cushioning and it’s on the firmer side, so ideal if you don’t like a shoe that feels like you’re sinking into it.

The energy return isn’t as exciting, but it is there. We’d say it sits in the realm of a shoe for daily, shorter runs, rather than one you’d use for long-distance training or fast racing.

It’s very comfortable, with a thickly padded tongue and heel cup, and the toebox accommodates a wide foot. It has a grippy outsole with relatively deep lugs for a road shoe, so we found it had good traction in wetter or softer conditions, and both outsole and upper feel durable.

The levitate 6 comes in two versions – neutral and support – and this is the support version. It’s extremely comfortable, encourages a natural roll-through and the Guiderails technology does its job for stability. There is decent energy return and the cushioning is on the firmer side, which is great if you like that.

The upper is supportive and durable, and the shoe looks surprisingly streamlined for a support shoe, which can often look bulky, although it is at the heavier end of the running show spectrum. It comes up on the narrower side (not ridiculously so – it just won’t suit very wide feet).

A good-value neutral shoe that comes in at the lower priced end of Nike offerings, this style is known as a workhorse. It’s billed as a great daily shoe and that was our experience of it. It doesn’t blow you away with fancy geometry or exciting energy return – it just does what it does, which is being a well-designed daily shoe that will last.

You can feel the cushioning in the heel, less so in the forefoot, so it’s good if you like more ground feel from your running shoe. It’s quite light, accommodates a wide foot and has a grippier outsole than most of the shoes we tested, so it can handle light trails (soft paths around parks, maybe a damp forest floor).

This shoe is also among the most durable in this round-up, with a tough upper and outsole. Because the cushioning isn’t super bouncy, it doesn’t feel like much will be lost over time.

This is a neutral shoe that gives a nicely cushioned ride, but we found that it wasn’t propulsive enough for upping the pace beyond steady, and it is a heavy shoe. The upper is in one piece, which makes it a little hard to get on, but it hugs the foot well once it’s on, giving it a stable feel.

The brand has designed it for women, with a narrower heel fit and lower instep curve, to reduce heel slippage, and this works well if your feet are on the narrower, more petite side.

It’s known for being a durable shoe and we think the midsole and outsole will hold up well, although it has the kind of stretchy upper over the toes that makes us think that our big toe might come through it before the rest of the shoe wears out. You’ll like it if a less rigid upper is your preference, though. As mentioned, it comes up narrow and quite small, so you’ll definitely need a size up from your street-shoe size.

This is Mizuno’s top-end support shoe and provides a luxurious ride. It’s supremely comfortable with a soft, well-fitting heel cup and relatively wide toe box (although not quite as wide as Mizuno’s popular support shoe, the wave inspire).

It fulfils its support brief well, aided by a wide outsole. It has superb cushioning combined with excellent energy return, and we’d happily train for long runs in these.

This shoe is on the heavier side but we didn’t notice it much. Our only small complaint would be that the upper over the toes is very stretchy – while comfortable, we’re not sure how long it will last if you’re someone who usually wears through their running shoes over your big toe.

This is a stability shoe that will suit those with a high foot volume (the amount of vertical space your foot takes up). It has a comfortable, deep and supportive fit, especially around the heel, and plenty of space in the toebox, both in width and depth. Narrow feet would probably move around na fair amount.

The cushioning is on the firmer side and the stability is very present in an extended medial post, designed for people who really do overpronate, rather than those on the cusp. This takes it up to the heavier end of shoes but it doesn’t feel clunky. 

We like this neutral shoe a lot. Designed for running fast, we would favour it for speed training, 5-10K races or even a speedy half marathon if you have good technique and don’t come down hard on your shoes – it has enough cushioning to feel comfortable but probably not enough to absorb miles of high impact.

It’s extremely comfortable and houses a reasonably wide foot. Its rocker shape and speedboard (a stiff, spoon-shaped panel in the midsole) gives a catapult-like sensation as you roll through to toe off and the cushioning is lively and responsive.

It’s very light at 200g – the upper is minimalist to keep the weight down but holds the shoe to the foot securely, keeps the heel comfortably cupped and supported and it feels very durable. The soft, thin, breathable tongue is well designed and the rubber sections on the outsole give a nice feeling of grip when running fast.

This is the brand’s most popular shoe and for good reason. We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again – it’s hard not to give an audible sigh when you slip on a Brooks GTS. Its plush heel cushioning, padded tongue and well-shaped insole make for next-level comfort.

It still uses the signature GuideRails system to keep your overpronating feet on the straight and narrow and it does this very effectively without being intrusive. Billed as giving you "a smooth and floaty-feeling run", it fulfils its promise and the miles slip away with soft cushioning that has a nice bounce to it.

You may notice the 12mm drop if you usually run in a lower drop but we generally run in 10mm drop shoes and adapted quickly. The upper is durable and breathable and the overall profile is surprisingly non-chunky for a stability shoe. It also comes in a selection of widths, so there’s something for everyone.

An iconic stability shoe that’s now on its 30th iteration, it looks significantly different to the 29, with a wider base and increased stack height. It’s incredibly comfortable and as stable as it gets if you overpronate.

We found it to be slightly more propulsive off the toes than its predecessor but we felt that an increased heel bevel that promises smoother transitions didn’t deliver on this because of the added stack height (it’s now 39mm at the heel and 29mm in the forefoot).

This comes from additional cushioning and while we can certainly feel the difference from the 29, it didn’t necessarily feel lacking in that model – you’ll really appreciate it if you come down hard on your shoes, though. It suits wide feet (narrow footed runners might find too much lateral movement), especially if you go up a size.

A neutral shoe designed for up to 20K per week (in several separate sessions), this is a decent budget option for shorter runs. It’s light and surprisingly flexible, which allows for a natural roll-through as you run. The stack height isn’t very big, either, so, there’s a reasonable ground feel, which you’ll like if you’re not a fan of maximal shoes.

The 4mm drop continues this theme of being almost like a barefoot shoe but the moderate and comfortable cushioning draws it away from that. It has a slightly pointed shape that we haven’t seen in running shoes before but it didn’t affect the fit and the shoe is very comfortable. Ideal for walk/running or low-volume running.

A shoe endorsed by the Royal College of Podiatry and designed to be a hybrid – a mixture of a road and trail shoe. The 4mm lugs give it superior grip to a road shoe (these are well placed and perform well) but it doesn’t have the weight and heft of a trail shoe from features such as toe protection.

This makes it ideal for autumn/winter running if you’re not just a pavement pounder and want a little extra grip for the park, firmer trails or races that are a mix of road and moderate trail.

It’s fairly cushioned and nicely responsive, making the miles feel easy, especially if you’re not on tarmac for the whole run. It’s billed as a neutral shoe but we found that it offered a little stability for an overpronator. The upper feels durable and the heels feel cupped and secure. The regular fit comes up narrow (but it’s available in wide) and 5mm is a fairly low drop so ease in if you’re used to a higher one.

RFG stands for Run For Good and this neutral shoe has been launched as part of the brand’s commitment to 90 per cent of its products containing organic, recycled or renewable materials by 2025. Its upper uses plant-based dyes, the midsole foam is 55 per cent corn-based and the outsole is 80 per cent natural rubber.

The industry should take note because it still performs well as an everyday running shoe – the cushioning is reassuringly maximal and absorbs the impact of long miles combined with a nice responsiveness.

It’s also quite flexible and rolls through well. The arch support is great but this isn’t a shoe for the wide of foot – it will suit narrow footed runners who like a thicker, supportive upper to stop their feet wallowing about, and we’d recommend going up a whole size from your street shoe size.

Among the elite ranks of lightweight running shoes, the condor 3 emerges as a standout – effortlessly blending top-tier performance with eco-conscious design.

With a bio-based midsole crafted from sugar cane and Amazonian rubber, these shoes offer unparalleled comfort and support while remaining incredibly light on the feet, weighing just 287g. Coupled with a grippy outsole and full-length L-foam cushioning, runners can expect exceptional shock absorption for a smooth and stable run.

Priced at £160, these eco-friendly champions are primed to elevate any runner’s experience to new heights of agility and speed.