Computers: Feedback
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IT'S ONLY a few years since most of the major PC software packages had a list price of pounds 200-300. In its early days, Lotus copy protected 123 too. Then, the explanation given for piracy was that software was over-priced and that if a more reasonable amount was asked people would buy instead of copying.
Nowadays, the list prices have roughly halved and most vendors have a 'competitive upgrade' arrangement so the real price is around pounds 100 for most packages. Despite this, copying persists.
The future seems to offer two options; the use of 'dongles' plugged into our PCs to permit each bit of software to run (quite entertaining when you've got five or six to fit in) or the monthly subscription system you describe.
What people do not seem to realise is that you only get what you pay for. The recent software price cuts have led to hotline support being virtually withdrawn unless you pay an arm and a leg. Development of future products is also costly and cannot be met unless someone is funding it. This means we are going to limit our future choice unless we are careful.
Colin Malsingh
100272.2452@compuserve. com
ANDREW BROWN perhaps sounds the death-knell for copyright too early in his examination of software and network piracy (27 May).
It is quite true, of course, that encryption technology will accomplish effectively what the law cannot do. But the law has never, even in the case of the printed page, stopped people copying. The law is there to provide sanctions when people transgress the boundaries.
Copyright is evolving to keep up with the technological race. UK copyright law, for example, has recognised electronic copying for nearly half a decade, 'Digitised music' will infringe copyright if the original score is copied without permission and anyone who authorises such copying is also going to be liable. Commercial information networks should not be surprised to find themselves on the wrong end of litigation if they fail to take account of copyright.
Peter Weinand
London WC2