Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Revealed: 12 sites for burying nuclear waste

Nigel Morris,Home Affairs Correspondent
Saturday 11 June 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A secret list of 12 sites considered for burying nuclear waste, including some near built-up areas, has been released under the Freedom of Information Act after being kept under wraps since the 1980s.

Although Nirex, the nuclear disposal company, said the programme was abandoned eight years ago, anti-nuclear campaigners yesterday warned the sites could be examined again.

They were: Bradwell and Potton Island, Essex; Stanford, Norfolk; Killingholme, Lincolnshire; two in Sellafield, Cumbria; Dounreay and Altnabreac in Caithness; and the Fuday and Sandray islands in the Outer Hebrides. Offshore sites near Redcar, North Yorkshire, and Hunterston on the Clyde were also considered. The waste is now stored at 34 locations around the UK awaiting a decision on long-term disposal.

Tony Juniper, director of Friends of the Earth, said: "Nirex has made it quite clear that each of the sites considered geologically suitable in the past could be considered suitable in the future. Every community named should take steps to help halt plans to expand nuclear power in the UK."

Nirex's managing director, Chris Murray, said: "Radioactive waste exists and needs to be dealt with. It is as much an ethical and social issue as a scientific and technical one. This is the key lesson we have learnt. Openness and transparency must underpin everything."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in