Wind turbine emoji application rejected, leaving climate campaigners ‘perplexed’
*Sad face emoji*
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Emojis, the concise hieroglyphs of modern life, play a growing role in our communication-dependent world, but what does one do when the required image doesn’t yet exist?
The lack of a wind turbine emoji has apparently been noticed by UK climate charity Possible and renewable energy trade association Renewable UK, who took action to try and rectify the oversight.
Afterall, there are already emojis representing fossil fuels, including oil drums and petrol pumps, but searches for “solar” and “wind” in the index of ideograms bring up nothing pertaining to the energy industry.
So they contacted company Unicode - keepers of the emoji - to request an addition to the lexicon.
Rather than creating jobs at the Cumbria coal mine, we should focus on employment in renewable energy
Renewable not nuclear power is the future of green energy in the UK
UK’s largest emitters should pay carbon taxes, says citizens’ climate jury
Reality show sparks fiery debate: Does a thumbs-up emoji mean ‘f*** you?
Each year Unicode releases more emojis and considers applications for new ones.
But Unicode rejected the calls to produce a tiny graphic of a wind turbine, saying they already considering a potentially forthcoming emoji of a “windmill”, and therefore producing a wind turbine would be too similar.
The decision has caused irritation for Possible and Renewable UK, who argue wind turbines and windmills are different pieces of kit, used for different things.
In a Twitter thread, Possible explained the situation.
“Last year we submitted an application to @unicode, together with @RenewableUK, for a (long overdue) wind turbine emoji [wind blowing face emoji]”.
“Unfortunately they rejected our application [pleading face emoji].
“The reason they gave for rejecting our application was that a “windmill” emoji was currently under review and “this would essentially duplicate most of the reasons for adding a wind energy device...as they are too similar.”
They added: “The reasons given for creating your proposed emoji cannot be directly linked to a ‘cause’, i.e you can’t say ‘we should have a wind turbine emoji because it will indirectly help to tackle climate change’ (even though it would).”
Noting the existence of the petrol and oil emojis already available, Possible added: “It’s fair to say we were quite perplexed by their decision [thinking face emoji].
“Windmills and wind turbines are very different tech and people would likely use these emojis in entirely different contexts.”
“Emojis are an important part of how we talk to each other, so it only seems sensible that our vocabulary should include symbols relating to climate change.”
“We hope that once they begin accepting emoji applications again, they will reconsider, and offer some more climate themed emojis too.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments