US may abandon its contract with BNFL
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The United States government has said it it is "disturbed" and "dismayed" by the conduct of British Nuclear Fuels, which has more than doubled its bill for a massive clean-up at an American nuclear site.
Bill Richardson, the Energy Secretary, said in a statement that he is "evaluating possible alternative approaches including recompeting to seek other contractors" for the operation at the Hanford nuclear site in Washington state, for which BNFL Inc, BNFL's US subsidiary, is now demanding $15.2bn (£10bn). "We will not approve this proposal," he said. "The price is unacceptably high and is unfundable."
His criticism went wider than the cost. "I have also been disturbed by the series of senior management changes in BNFL," he said.
Hanford nuclear reservation, where weapons-grade plutonium was produced for 50 years, now contains 54 million gallons of radioactive waste in 177 underground storage tanks, some of which have leaked.
BNFL Inc won the contract to build and operate a vitrification plant to turn the waste into glass at an original projected cost of $6.9bn, half of which was for the financing of the high-risk project. But when it submitted the final plan on Monday, the cost had increased to $15.2bn.
BNFL Inc's president and chief executive, Paul Miskimin, said the price was reasonable considering the commercial risk of the project but "in all likelihood" was not affordable. "Few people now believe this is the right way to finance this job," he admitted.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments