Sellafield faces huge cutback in permitted radioactive discharges
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Radioactive discharges from the Sellafield nuclear plant are to be cut by up to 35 per cent under a new safety crackdown by the Environment Agency.
After nearly a decade of promises by the Government, the safety watchdog has finally announced its plans to tighten regulations on air and sea pollution from the British Nuclear Fuels site in Cumbria.
Under the proposals, due to be sent to ministers for approval, BNFL will face much lower limits on discharges of waste into the Irish Sea.
Hailed by the agency as a "major milestone" in the clean-up of Sellafield, the move will mean that three-quarters of the aerial limits and half of the liquid- discharge limits at the plant will be reduced.
The changes will see potential radiation doses to members of the public in Cumbria cut by between 25 and 35 per cent, the agency claims.
A single safety certificate for all air, sea and land waste disposals by Sellafield will be introduced, along with stricter site monitoring and analysis.
BNFL said last night that it accepted it was now virtually inevitable that the new restrictions would be introduced, but warned that it could cost the company an extra £40m to enforce. It claimed that the additional monitoring would impose a significant "burden" on operations and suggested that its frontline staff could face greater radiation exposure to comply with the checks.
The Irish government, Scandinavian countries and green groups have long called for action to be taken against the company.
Among the changes proposed, tritium limits will be cut by 20 per cent, cobalt-60 by 72 per cent and caesium-134 by 76 per cent. New controls will also be imposed on discharges from individual plants as well as from the site as a whole.
A spokesman for BNFL said: "The overall benefits of what the agency is proposing are difficult to quantify and it is our view that the overall environmental benefit will be minimal."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments