Scientists clash over badger cull trial to trace TB
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Scientists fell out yesterday over the trials to see if tuberculosis in cattle can be controlled by killing badgers, suspected of carrying the disease.
The government trials, which have cost more than £25m over six years, involve culling badgers in different areasto see if differences in bovine TB infection rates show up. Farmers have supported the trials, whereas animal welfare activists have opposed them. But yesterday the review group set up by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs criticised the work of the scientists, partly because the trials cannot be carried out as planned. Under recent animal welfare regulations the badgers must be captured and humanely put down, meaning that at most 80 per cent are removed, undermining the scientific grounds of the trial.
The review group, led by Professor Charles Godfray, director of the Centre for Population Biology at Imperial College, London, criticises the time taken to deliver the results, and the possibility that they will be inconclusive. The scientists running the trials, led by Professor John Bourne, former director of the Institute for Animal Health, said the criticisms were based on "fundamental misunderstandings".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments