Scientist admits climate errors were 'embarrassing'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One of President Barack Obama's leading scientific advisers has criticised the UN body overseeing the science of climate change, describing the errors and sloppy mistakes which have affected public confidence in climate science as "an embarrassment".
Jane Lubchenco, the administrator of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), said that the fundamental science of climate change had not been affected by the errors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports and the "totality" of the scientific assessments was still sound.
"[The IPCC] has had a wake-up call and it is taking steps to address the mistakes that were made and to ensure that they don't happen again," Dr Lubchenco said. "I think it is important to recognise there were errors ... but that those errors are very few relative to the thousands of conclusions that are in the report."
The 2007 report of the IPCC working group 2 said the Himalayan glaciers were likely to have melted by 2035, a statement based on speculation. Other parts of the report were based on non-peer reviewed literature.
"I think the existence of any errors at all is an embarrassment, and the leaders of the IPCC are absolutely committed to examining the processes and checks and balances that are in place to make it as error-free as is humanly possible. Scientists working on the next IPCC have had very intense serious discussions about how to improve the process, how to make it even better," Dr Lubchenco said.
"It's also important to note that despite those errors, the totality of the IPCC is robust and that the conclusions that the Earth is warming and that humans are largely responsible for most of the warming in the last few decades, those conclusions do not rest on any single analysis or any single dataset or any single of the thousands of conclusions," she said. "The fundamental conclusions of the IPCC remain robust."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments