Why was the Maui wildfire so devastating? Scientists have new insights thanks to computer models of the blaze
One expert said the National Weather Service should have issued alerts to specific locations for the high winds that drove the devastating August wildfires on Maui.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Four months ago, a series of wildfires devastated the Hawaiian island of Maui, killing at least 100 people and destroying an estimated 3,000 homes and apartments.
Now, the San Francisco Chronicle reports the National Weather Service (NWS) could have issued more accurate warnings for high winds that fanned the flames, according to experts who studied computer models of the August blaze.
While meteorologists initially reported that high winds from Hurricane Dora drove the flames, new computer models show that a downslope windstorm caused by accelerating trade winds may have caused the fire to spiral out of control, the Chronicle reports. Downslope windstorms have also caused some of California’s most devastating fires.
Steven Businger, chair of the department of atmospheric sciences at the University of Hawaii, told the Chronicle the NWS in Hawai’i could have warned residents about specific locations of concern leading up to the windstorm. That information was available at the time thanks to weather models, according to the Chronicle.
The Chronicle reports the NWS instead issued a broad warning for the entire island.
“We have to learn how to use [meteorology], with the context of knowing about the fuels and the urban risk, to warn people,” Cliff Mass, a professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Washington, told the Chronicle.
“It’s completely preventable,” Mr Mass continued.
The Independent reached out to the NWS for comment.
The Maui wildfires marked the deadliest US blaze in more than 100 years — and ever since, scientists have been trying to piece together what caused the disaster. One component was the windstorm hitting the islands in early August, bringing the high gusts Mr Businger said the NWS should have issued more precise warnings about.
Another factor may have been overgrown gully experts that was not properly managed by the Hawaiian Electric Company, the Associated Press reported in September. The company is facing several lawsuits that claim they acted negligently leading up to the fires, such as by failing to initially cut electricity amid high-wind warnings and failing to clear growth near power lines.
The company has admitted that downed power lines caused the initial blaze but denied responsibility for the flare-ups that devastated the island. Regarding the overgrown gully, the company told the AP they are allowed to “remove anything that interferes with our lines and could potentially cause an outage” but they cannot “go on to private property to perform landscaping or grass-mowing.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments