How extinction of five-tonne sloths slows up growth along the Amazon
Region now lacking the fertilising effect provided by South America's distinctive 'mega-fauna' - which has led to a serious imbalance of soil minerals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Vast regions of the Amazon are growing more slowly than they were several thousand years ago because they lack the fertilising effect provided by South America’s distinctive “mega-fauna” – the very large mammals that went extinct soon after the arrival of humans.
A study of how soil nutrients are distributed within the Amazon basin has revealed there is a dearth of vital minerals such as phosphorus because large mammals no longer roam the region to fertilise the soil with their dung.
Scientists believe that the extinction of large herbivores, such as five-tonne ground sloths and armadillo-like glyptodonts the size of small cars, led to a serious imbalance of soil minerals which is still having an impact today.
“It is having a big effect. The Eastern Amazon in particular is phosphorus-limited which means that if you added phosphorus to the region the trees there would grow faster,” said Christopher Doughty of the University of Oxford, the lead author of the study.
“When you had big animals roaming more than 12,000 years ago, there would have been wider dispersal of minerals such as phosphorus and the trees there would have been growing faster than they are today,” Dr Doughty said.
Minerals are continually washed down from the high Andes by the Amazon and its tributaries, but the elements tend to remain within the muddy soil of the flood plains rather than being dispersed more widely.
This was not the case for tens of thousands of years previously when generation after generation of the mega-fauna fed on the plants and trees growing in the flood plains before roaming to higher ground where they fertilised the soil with their dung and dead bodies, the scientists said.
The study, published in Nature Geoscience, calculated 98 per cent of nutrient-dispersal has been lost since the extinction of the mega-fauna, which happened around the same time that humans first colonised South America from the north.
“While 12,000 years may be a timescale that is beyond most people’s understanding, through this model we show that extinctions back then still affect the health of the planet to this day,” Dr Doughty said. “Put simply, the bigger the animal, the bigger its role in distributing nutrients that enrich the environment.
“Most of the planet’s large animals have already gone extinct, thereby severing the arteries that carried nutrients far beyond the rivers into infertile areas,” he said.
Deforestation of the Amazon is hindering the dispersal even more because although human activity leads to increased fertilisers being added to the land, these become concentrated as a result of farming practices such as the fencing-in of livestock.
Wild mega-fauna that roamed freely acted in the same way as the arteries of the human body by distributing nutrients further and further from the source, the scientists said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments