Greenpeace anti-fracking advert banned for claiming support of 'experts'
The national press ad said: 'Fracking threatens our climate, our countryside and our water. Yet experts agree – it won’t cut our energy bills'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Greenpeace advert opposing fracking has been banned for claiming experts agreed that the process would not cut energy bills.
The national press ad said: “Fracking threatens our climate, our countryside and our water. Yet experts agree – it won’t cut our energy bills.”
The Labour peer Lord Lipsey, who said he understood there was a range of views on the subject, complained that the ad was misleading for claiming experts were in agreement.
Greenpeace said the claim was made in the context of a public debate on Government policy, and cited quotes from David Cameron, who has repeatedly backed fracking and claimed that it could bring down energy bills.
The organisation provided quotes from 22 people, groups or organisations supporting the view that fracking would not reduce energy prices.
The Advertising Standards Authority said: “While we acknowledged that Greenpeace had provided quotes from 22 people, groups or organisations demonstrating support for the view that fracking would not reduce energy prices, we understood that there was a significant division of ... opinion on the issue.
“We considered the claim was absolute in nature and therefore implied the statement was accepted among informed opinion, which we understood was not the case.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments