Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

GM crops are given qualified go-ahead

Michael McCarthy,Environment Editor
Wednesday 10 March 2004 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The long argument over whether or not genetically-modified crops should be commercially grown in Britain ended yesterday when the Environment Secretary, Margaret Beckett, announced a formal but heavily-qualified go-ahead for the growing of GM maize.

Her decision was denounced by environmental and consumer groups who have long contended that GM crops may damage the environment and are not wanted by the public.

But it was welcomed by the biotech industry, and by many leading scientists who insist that GM technology can bring many benefits to agriculture in the future.

Mrs Beckett based the Government's decision squarely on its own four-year-long, large-scale trial of three GM crops proposed for growth in Britain, all genetically-modified to be herbicide-tolerant to allow the use of extra-powerful weedkillers. Reporting last autumn, the trials found that in the case of beet and oilseed rape, the GM crops and their associated weedkillers were more likely to harm farmland wildlife such as insects, wild flowers and birds than their conventional crop equivalents. But with maize the opposite was true, and the GM crop was less damaging. On this basis, Mrs Beckett told MPs yesterday, the Government would oppose the cultivation of the particular varieties of GM beet and oilseed rape throughout the European Union but would agree "in principle" to the growing of GM maize.

She said GM growers would be expected to monitor changes in herbicide use on conventional maize. A much-raised objection to GM maize "passing its test" in the trials is that the weedkiller used with the conventional crops for comparison, atrazine, is such a deadly chemical that it is being phased out across Europe, and therefore the comparison was invalid.

Mrs Beckett indicated that the GM maize and other crops would only be grown under a legal liability regime by which organic farmers could seek damages if their own crops were contaminated with GM pollen, and that would have to be funded "by the GM sector itself, rather than by Government or producers of non- GM crops". Mrs Beckett said the Government intended to look at all applications to grow GM crops case by case.

The shadow agriculture minister, John Whittingdale, warned that despite the Government's decision, more than 40 regions in Britain wanted to declare themselves GM-free, including Cornwall, Devon, Somerset and the Lake District. He added that 90 per cent of the public had voiced opposition to the technology when they were questioned as part of last summer's GM debate.

Tony Juniper, director of Friends of the Earth, said the Government "has given the thumbs-up to GM maize and shown two fingers to the British".

But Professor Chris Lamb, director of a plant research establishment, the John Innes Centre in Norwich, said: "The lesson we must learn from GM is that if society is to reap the benefits that plant science can bring, we need long-term policy-making that identifies what it is society requires from agriculture and new plant-based industries."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in