Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Attempts to reopen global elephant ivory trade fail

Debate at wildlife watchdog becomes heated over allowing sales that would ‘fuel poaching’

Jane Dalton
Thursday 22 August 2019 21:29 BST
Comments
Ivory confiscated from smugglers and poachers has been burnt in the past but some countries wanted to sell it instead
Ivory confiscated from smugglers and poachers has been burnt in the past but some countries wanted to sell it instead (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Attempts by four African countries to resume international ivory sales have failed.

Experts had feared a repeat of a 2008 trial, when ivory stockpiles were sold, prompting a surge in elephant poaching.

But after heated debate, delegates at the world’s largest conference on wildlife trade, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites), rejected a proposal by Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe to sell stockpiled ivory on their home soil as well as ivory from South Africa.

Zambia also abandoned a bid to sell its ivory stockpiles as part of a proposal to downlist its elephants to Appendix II, which would have loosened protection for the animals.

Matt Collis, head of delegation at Cites for the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw), said: “Any legal market in ivory presents opportunities for the laundering of illegal ivory.

(Paul Nicholls)
(Paul Nicholls) (PIC PAUL NICHOLLS)

“Parties need to focus on the closure of domestic markets and markedly increase their law-enforcement efforts to prevent illegal trade. Poaching skyrocketed across Africa after the last ivory stockpile sales back in 2008. Ifaw is delighted governments have chosen to reject repeating that failed experiment.”

Ivory smuggling out of Africa rose by 71 per cent following the 2008 stockpile sales, Ifaw says.

At least 20,000 elephants are illegally killed each year for their ivory – with an average of 55 elephants poached every day in Africa - the equivalent of one every 26 minutes.

However, countries rejected a motion that would have put all southern African elephants on Appendix I, offering the highest protection level that would have banned all trade.

The European Union was among those saying the move did not meet “biological criteria”.

All African elephants were given the highest listing in 1989 but the protection was weakened in 1997 and 2000 when populations in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe were downlisted to Appendix II – a less endangered status – to allow sales of ivory stockpiles to Japan and China.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

The latest decision "mean it’s status quo for elephants. No international commercial ivory trade is permitted and that is what needs to happen,” said Susan Lieberman of the Wildlife Conservation Society.

Separately, delegates voted to protect giraffes for the first time, drawing praise from conservationists and scowls from some sub-Saharan African nations.

Tanzania said it had a stable and increasing population of giraffes, but official figures show giraffe numbers have fallen 40 per cent in 30 years.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in