DIY store levies bag 'tax'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Shoppers are to be charged extra for using plastic bags for the first time in the UK in a pilot scheme designed to protect the environment by discouraging consumers from using them.
Shoppers are to be charged extra for using plastic bags for the first time in the UK in a pilot scheme designed to protect the environment by discouraging consumers from using them.
From today, B&Q, the home improvement retailer, will charge customers in its 33 Scottish stores a 5p levy on carrier bags. Proceeds will go to an environmental charity.
Britons use more than eight billion bags a year, which, when disposed of in landfill sites, can take up to a million years to decompose completely. The Government has ruled out an official tax on thebags.
"Plastic causes enormous death and injury to birds, marine mammals and other forms of wildlife," said a spokesman for B&Q.
There was a 90 per cent fall in the number of bags issued by shops in Ireland when a tax was introduced two years ago.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments