Court bid to give dolphins more protection is rejected
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.However, despite rejecting its application, Mr Justice Stanley Burnton gave Greenpeace permission to take the case to the Court of Appeal, saying it was possible the higher court would disagree with him.
And he indicated any appeal should be heard as a matter of urgency, before the season for sea bass fishing by the practice of "pair" trawling - which causes the high number of dolphin deaths - begins in February. He also refused to order Greenpeace to pay the Government's costs, saying that the case raised issues of "real importance". Greenpeace said the ruling had exposed the Government's ban on pair trawling within a 12-mile limit as "a hollow political gesture". The issue of dolphin deaths in the English Channel is seen by environmental campaigners as a crucial test of how countries balance the interests of commercial fishing and protected species.
Pair trawling, largely by French fishing vessels, has increased as demand has risen for sea bass, which gather in the Channel to spawn in the early spring. The dolphins, which feed on smaller fish, get caught in the vast nets and campaigners said hundreds die this way each season
Greenpeace was seeking a judicial review of the Government's ban, announced a year ago by Fisheries Minister Ben Bradshaw. Its lawyers argued that very little pair trawling took place within the limit and that the ban only has the effect of forcing the trawlers further into the areas where dolphins are more numerous. It said the Government should extend the limit to the mid-point of the Channel and should campaign in Europe for a total ban.
Mr Bradshaw said later that he was "delighted" that the court had rejected Greenpeace's action in full.
He said: "No country has done more than the UK under this Government to protect small cetaceans."
Willie Mackenzie, Greenpeace's oceans campaigner, said: "The Government has the power to protect dolphins in half the English Channel, but instead they've been hiding behind meaningless conservation gestures and putting fishermen before dolphin populations."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments