Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Council tries to sink scrapping of the 'ghost fleet'

Michael McCarthy,Environment Editor
Wednesday 08 October 2003 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The "ghost fleet" of contaminated US Navy ships heading for Hartlepool to be scrapped faced a new obstacle yesterday when the local council said the company intending to dismantle them, Able UK, did not have planning permission for its dry dock.

After the failure of a court case brought by environmentalists to keep the ships in dock in Virginia, the first two vessels in the flotilla of 13 left the US on Monday night for Teesside. The auxiliary oil tankers Canisteo and Caloosahatchee are being towed across the Atlantic by tug in a journey expected to last three weeks.

Two more ships are free to leave at any time, and another nine are being held in port while a court battle between the US Maritime Administration and American environmental groups goes on in Washington. Peter Stephenson, managing director of Able UK, was "confident all the necessary planning approvals are in place". But Hartlepool council said there was "no valid planning permission to allow for the construction of the proposed dam and the reinstatement of the dock gates, to provide a dry dock''. Green campaigners say that the ships, which are up to 50 years old and contaminated with chemicals including PCBs, asbestos and heavy diesel, could break up on the crossing, causing an environmental catastrophe.

The contract is worth £16m to the company and will create about 200 jobs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in